Malaysian MPs should reject restrictive amendments to internet and communications law

Reposted from IFEX

40 IFEX members and regional civil society groups have called on Malaysian MPs to ensure media laws are in line with international standards on online freedom of expression and access to information.

25 May 2016


Prime Minister Mr. Najib Abdul Razak
President of Barisan Nasional

Minister Mr. Salleh Said Keruak
Ministry of Communication and Multimedia

Mr. Anwar Ibrahim
Leader of Opposition

Your Excellencies,

We, the undersigned organisations, express our collective concern over the proposed amendments to the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA) 1998 in the Malaysian Parliament, which will have the impact of restricting the public’s right to freedom of expression and information online. We join the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) and its Malaysian partners as well as the Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA) to call on all elected Members of Parliament to reject the proposed amendments.

The CMA is the main law regulating the Internet, broadcasting and telecommunications industries. Since 2009, it has been used to persecute bloggers, activists, journalists, academics, politicians and other individuals accused of publishing anti-government or anti-establishment content. In 2015 alone, there were 42 cases of investigation, charges or convictions under Section 211, which prohibits offensive content, and Section 233, which criminalises the “improper” use of network facilities or network service to publish content deemed to be obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive. For example, in October 2015, activist Khalid Mohd Ismath was charged on 14 counts for posting comments on social media, allegedly offensive of the Johor state royalty. Eleven of those charges were under Section 233 of the CMA.

Questioning or criticising the royalty, as well as the official religion (Islam) and the country’s governance, is considered a politically sensitive issue in Malaysia. Other CMA related cases include the government instructions to certain Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block access to news websites like The Malaysian Insider, whistleblowing site the Sarawak Report, the Malaysian Chronicle and Asia Sentinel. Also blocked was the blog hosting platform, Medium, which published an article by Sarawak Report, and socio-political blogs OutSyed The Box, Din Turtle and Minaq Jingo Fotopages. These websites remain blocked in the country.

We are concerned over the lack of transparency in the government’s processes, as no specific information was provided on laws contravened or even the possibility of appeal. Actions by the state are clearly an assault on media freedom, freedom of information and Malaysia’s promise for a free Internet. The government’s actions appear to be part of a concerted and intensified effort to shut down dissenting views, particularly those questioning the integrity and leadership of Prime Minister Najib Razak. Government leaders and the country’s police chief have repeatedly warned the public on their use of social media as well as news websites that publish content seen as being critical of the establishment.

In addition to the registration of bloggers, we understand the amendments are expected to increase penalties for content-related offenses, and the powers of the Internet regulatory body – the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) – to take down online content without proper oversight. We are concerned that the regulation will require additional infrastructure such as data retention of users by internet service or content providers, which would also act as cost and administrative barriers to small-scale or community-based enterprises.

We firmly support the coalition’s position that bodies like the MCMC should not have discretion to block content; instead, its actions should be governed by its ten policy objectives, including creating a vibrant civil community, establishing Malaysia as a major global centre and hub for communications and multimedia information and content services, and creating robust applications environment for end users. Decisions to restrict freedom of information and expression should follow due process of the law and international standards and norms. They should be clear, least restrictive, necessary and proportionate, and at minimum, require a court order.

We urge MPs to reject any repressive amendments to the law, and instead, ask them to call for an open, participatory and transparent consultation with all stakeholders to review existing laws to ensure they are in line with international standards on online freedom of expression and access to information.


Centre for Independent Journalism – Malaysia
Adil Soz – International Foundation for Protection of Freedom of Speech
Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain
Association of Independent Electronic Media
Bytes for All
Cambodian Center for Human Rights
Canadian Journalists for Free Expression
Cartoonists Rights Network International
Committee to Protect Journalists
Foro de Periodismo Argentino
Freedom Forum
Free Media Movement
Index on Censorship
International Federation of Journalists
International Publishers Association
Media Institute of Southern Africa
Media Watch
National Union of Somali Journalists
Observatorio Latinoamericano para la Libertad de Expresión – OLA
Pacific Islands News Association
Pakistan Press Foundation
PEN American Center
PEN Canada
Southeast Asian Press Alliance
Thai Journalists Association
Vigilance pour la Démocratie et l’État Civique
World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters – AMARC
World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers

Asosiasaun Jornalista Timor Lorosae (AJTL)
Engage Media
Foundation for Community Educational Media (FCEM)
ICT Watch
Myanmar ICT Development Organisation (MIDO)
Philippines Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ)
Thai Netizen Network

Foundation for Media Alternatives

LBH Pers

Liza Garcia
Irene Poetranto

Shita Laksmi
Denden Shofiuddin




leave a comment